Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts
Showing posts with label literature. Show all posts

11.18.2013

Year of Reviews in Review: The New Environment and Development Literature

Amir Jina and I were recently discussing the multiple literature reviews that have come out on environment and development topics lately, and realized that there were so many we were starting to lose track. To that end, and as a service to those of you who aren't constantly trawling the working paper and journal lists, here's a quick rundown of the over ten (and counting) recent literature reviews that have come out in the newly emerging environment and development literature:

9.21.2012

Forensic economics

As I suspect is common in my cohort, I have a soft spot for "forensic economics," or economic research that documents illicit behavior. You can feel free to blame it on the popular success of Freakonomics, excess fascination with "clever" papers, peer effects of CSI, etc., but there's certainly something to be said for research which not only discovers something new but does so in spite of others' attempts to conceal it. Which is why I was particularly jazzed about this new paper in the Journal of Economic Literature (open access, btw):
Forensic Economics 
Eric Zitzewitz 
Abstract: A new meta-field of "forensic economics" has begun to emerge, uncovering evidence of hidden behavior in a variety of domains. Examples include teachers cheating on exams, road builders skimping on materials, violations of U.N. sanctions, unnecessary heart surgeries, and racial biases in employment decisions, traffic stops, auto retailing, and even sports judging. In each case, part of the contribution of economic analysis is in uncovering evidence of wrongdoing. Although research questions differ, forensic economic work shares commonalities in approaches and limitations. This article seeks to draw out the common threads, with the hope of stimulating further research across fields.
This is particularly nice since it stretches across fields. Some (quasi-arbitrarily) selected highlights:

7.19.2012

Does climate affect conflict? Evidence from Shakespeare


Mark Cane sends us this:
ROMEO and JULIET         ACT 3, SCENE 1a 
[A street. MERCUTIO, BENVOLIO & Servants] 
BENVOLIO
I pray thee, good Mercutio, let's retire.
The day is hot, the Capulets abroad,
And if we meet we shall not 'scape a brawl,
For now these hot days is the mad blood stirring.
[And later they do meet the Capulets and Tybalt kills Mercutio, then Romeo kills Tybalt and the rest is tragedy.]
For more fun evidence on the psychological effect of heat on aggression, see evidence from road rage and MLB.  Also this.

5.29.2012

Disease and Development: Some Notable Recent Findings

[This is a guest post by first year students in Columbia's Sustainable Development program]

As part of their coursework for the Human Ecology course, first years in Columbia's Sustainable Development Ph.D. program (and a few select students from the SIPA Masters programs) were asked to put together reviews of recently active areas of the broad environment/development literature. Anna Tompsett, the course's TA and sometimes guest blogger on FE, has asked the students permission to share them with us, so over the next two weeks we'll be posting them, starting with today's on disease and development. Enjoy! 

Disease and Development: Some Notable Recent Findings
by Kimberly Lai, Habtamu Fuje and Clarissa Santelmo

One of the most formidable impediments to sustainable development in low-income countries is disease. In an attempt to offer a rough sketch of the current state of research in this realm, we canvassed the past year’s worth of issues of three major journals—Nature, Lancet, and the New England Journal of Medicine—and picked out six articles that we found particularly relevant to disease, development, and global health policy.

We were especially interested in health issues that rate among the World Health Organization’s leading causes of death and global burden of disease in developing countries. (Global burden of disease measures years of healthy life lost to disability as well as death.) We selected studies based on the number of people that could benefit from the findings, out-of-sample validity (in the case of experimental studies), socioeconomic aspects, and potential policy implications.

5.21.2012

Empirics and modeling of climate adaptation

I, very regrettably, had to miss this workshop at the NBER last week. But it looks like it was terrific.  Several papers review the empirical or modeling literature on adaptation in a variety of sectors. Many of the reviews are incomplete drafts, but collectively they already represent a trove of useful and important information. Papers are linked in the program:
Integrated Assessment Modeling Conference 
Karen Fisher-Vanden, David Popp, and Ian Sue Wing, Organizers
May 17-18, 2012

6.30.2011

Nature and Science as [the] top social science journals too?

I was a little surprised by this, since publishing in Nature and Science is sometimes viewed as a "second tier" prospect in the social sciences:

An average social science article published in Nature (2000-2010) is more heavily cited than an average article in any social science journal, with a "citation impact" of 51 (see the Reuter's article here).

The second best place to get your social science article? Science (citation impact = 35).

Nature and Science don't publish many social science articles, 65 and 80 respectively over the last decade, but the articles they publish seem to do well.  For reference, note the citation impact for top economics-only journals (Quarterly Journal of Economics is top in 2008 with citation impact = 5) and the top political science-only journals (Political Analysis is top in 2007 with citation impact = 2.5).

A standard critique of Reuter's citation impact measure is that it counts an article's citations over a fairly short window of time just following that article's publication (2 years).  In the social sciences, articles may remain as unpublished working papers for several years, preventing many of their citations from being counted in Reuter's analysis. Is this long lag in publication timing driving Reuters' finding?  Probably not.  Reuter's also publishes a measure of impact that spans a longer time window following an article's publication: the 28 years from 1981-2008.  Giving an article in the Quarterly Journal of Economics almost thirty years to accumulate citations still leaves its average citation count (49) just behind a the two-year citation count for an article in Nature (51).  Similarly, the long-run citation count for The American Political Science Review is 31, just behind the two-year citation count for Science (35).

[If you're interested in citations and the structure of human knowledge more generally, see this earlier post.]

3.16.2011

Sustainable Development Articles

Our colleague James Rising points us to his newly coded up creation Sustainable Development Articles:
I put together a site for collecting Sustainable Development papers and articles! This is for all of us who wish there were a better way to find, share, and keep track of good SD reading material.
[...]

If you use Mendeley [previously blogged on FE here] for organizing your papers, you can drag-and-drop papers into the site by joining the Mendeley group "Sustainable Development to sd.existencia.org Bridge" and putting the papers there. With a delay (~ 1 hr), they'll show up on the site!
There's already a bunch of great stuff up there. Go take a look.